PHIL 3340 Environmental Ethics-Supporting the philosophical study of environmental issues at Middle Tennessee State University and beyond...
Saturday, September 15, 2018
Shocking change
Things are pretty shocking out there right now -- record-breaking storms, deadly terror attacks, thousands of migrants disappearing beneath the waves and openly supremacist movements rising. Are we responding with the urgency that these overlapping crises demand from us? Journalist and activist Naomi Klein studies how governments use large-scale shocks to push societies backward. She shares a few propositions from "The Leap" -- a manifesto (see below*) she wrote alongside indigenous elders, climate change activists, union leaders and others from different backgrounds -- which envisions a world after we've already made the transition to a clean economy and a much fairer society. "The shocking events that fill us with dread today can transform us, and they can transform the world for the better," Klein says. "But first we need to picture the world that we're fighting for. And we have to dream it up together." TED
* The Leap Manifesto is an inspiring, big-picture road map made up of 15 demands for an energy transition based in principles of justice, human rights, and worker solidarity. Sign here.
We must begin by respecting the inherent rights and title of the original caretakers of this land, starting by fully implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
The latest research shows we could get 100% of our electricity from renewable resources within two decades; by 2050 we could have a 100% clean economy. We demand that this shift begin now.
No new infrastructure projects that lock us into increased extraction decades into the future. The new iron law of energy development must be: if you wouldn’t want it in your backyard, then it doesn’t belong in anyone’s backyard.
The time for energy democracy has come: wherever possible, communities should collectively control new clean energy systems. Indigenous Peoples and others on the frontlines of polluting industrial activity should be first to receive public support for their own clean energy projects.
We want a universal program to build and retrofit energy efficient housing, ensuring that the lowest income communities will benefit first.
We want high-speed rail powered by just renewables and affordable public transit to unite every community in this country – in place of more cars, pipelines and exploding trains that endanger and divide us.
We want training and resources for workers in carbon-intensive jobs, ensuring they are fully able to participate in the clean energy economy.
We need to invest in our decaying public infrastructure so that it can withstand increasingly frequent extreme weather events.
We must develop a more localized and ecologically-based agricultural system to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, absorb shocks in the global supply – and produce healthier and more affordable food for everyone.
We call for an end to all trade deals that interfere with our attempts to rebuild local economies, regulate corporations and stop damaging extractive projects.
We demand immigration status and full protection for all workers. Canadians can begin to rebalance the scales of climate justice by welcoming refugees and migrants seeking safety and a better life.
We must expand those sectors that are already low-carbon: caregiving, teaching, social work, the arts and public-interest media. A national childcare program is long past due.
Since so much of the labour of caretaking – whether of people or the planet – is currently unpaid and often performed by women, we call for a vigorous debate about the introduction of a universal basic annual income.
We declare that “austerity” is a fossilized form of thinking that has become a threat to life on earth. The money we need to pay for this great transformation is available — we just need the right policies to release it. An end to fossil fuel subsidies. Financial transaction taxes. Increased resource royalties. Higher income taxes on corporations and wealthy people. A progressive carbon tax. Cuts to military spending.
We must work swiftly towards a system in which every vote counts and corporate money is removed from political campaigns.
This comment, "We declare that “austerity” is a fossilized form of thinking that has become a threat to life on earth. The money we need to pay for this great transformation is available — we just need the right policies to release it. An end to fossil fuel subsidies. Financial transaction taxes. Increased resource royalties. Higher income taxes on corporations and wealthy people. A progressive carbon tax. Cuts to military spending." bugs me. While I do agree that austerity is a old school way of think I have to disagree with some points of the proposed new way of thinking that is set forth. We know from experience that over taxing the wealth and corporations only ever hurts the consume and the lower class more then it could ever hurt or make an impact on the supposed wealthy members of society. Yet, the suggest about cutting military spending is the part that really made me disagree with this proposed new way of thought. The military is an important part of this nation and they have the most important job, making sure that we are able to remain free and able to make our own choices regarding our future. So, in no way shape or form could I support the idea that reducing their budget would be a good idea, I have known a lot of people in the military and one of their most prevalent comments is that they are lacking sufficient funding to actually make a difference.
There are many environmental issues caused by landfills. Wild animals like bears and seagulls are attracted to landfills because of the large amounts of food that are thrown out. This is a problem because it artificially sustains animal populations that grow out of proportion to the natural balance of their species. The foods that these creatures live off of can also be unhealthy for them. New York’s State Department of Health reports that at least 90% of gases given off by landfills are made up of carbon dioxide and methane. Methane is 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide and contributes to the greenhouse gases that cause global warming. These gases are produced by rotting organic materials and household cleaning products. Dust and other contaminants found in landfills also contribute to air quality problems in the local area. Landfills are a major source of groundwater contamination caused by industrial and household chemicals leaking into water sources. Ammonia is commonly found in landfills. It converts to nitrogen, seeps into rivers and lakes and causes eutrophication. Eutrphication occurs when algae growth increases and uses all the oxygen in the water. This lack of oxygen kills aquatic life. Toxins in the water can kill animals that drink surface waters. Researchers at the University of Southern Indiana see recycling as a cheaper alternative to incineration or the use of landfills. Another way to reduce the impact of landfills would be landfill mining. Landfill mining involves the extraction of buried metals, electronics, and minerals that would otherwise contribute to landfill masses. This is an environmentally friendly and cost effective means of producing and mining materials in other ways.
Thanks for linking this article I learned a lot. I sometimes forget that landfills are still a thing and that they have such an impact of the area in which they reside. The fact that they harm animals makes sense because landfills are unnatural obstacles that we put in their way so they inevitability cause problems for the surrounding wild life and their safety.
This comment, "We declare that “austerity” is a fossilized form of thinking that has become a threat to life on earth. The money we need to pay for this great transformation is available — we just need the right policies to release it. An end to fossil fuel subsidies. Financial transaction taxes. Increased resource royalties. Higher income taxes on corporations and wealthy people. A progressive carbon tax. Cuts to military spending." bugs me. While I do agree that austerity is a old school way of think I have to disagree with some points of the proposed new way of thinking that is set forth. We know from experience that over taxing the wealth and corporations only ever hurts the consume and the lower class more then it could ever hurt or make an impact on the supposed wealthy members of society. Yet, the suggest about cutting military spending is the part that really made me disagree with this proposed new way of thought. The military is an important part of this nation and they have the most important job, making sure that we are able to remain free and able to make our own choices regarding our future. So, in no way shape or form could I support the idea that reducing their budget would be a good idea, I have known a lot of people in the military and one of their most prevalent comments is that they are lacking sufficient funding to actually make a difference.
ReplyDeleteFrom The Washington Post: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/opinion-climate-change-is-political-when-you-deny-its-happening/vi-BBNfycj?ocid=ientp
ReplyDelete(Teya James)
There are many environmental issues caused by landfills. Wild animals like bears and seagulls are attracted to landfills because of the large amounts of food that are thrown out. This is a problem because it artificially sustains animal populations that grow out of proportion to the natural balance of their species. The foods that these creatures live off of can also be unhealthy for them. New York’s State Department of Health reports that at least 90% of gases given off by landfills are made up of carbon dioxide and methane. Methane is 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide and contributes to the greenhouse gases that cause global warming. These gases are produced by rotting organic materials and household cleaning products. Dust and other contaminants found in landfills also contribute to air quality problems in the local area. Landfills are a major source of groundwater contamination caused by industrial and household chemicals leaking into water sources. Ammonia is commonly found in landfills. It converts to nitrogen, seeps into rivers and lakes and causes eutrophication. Eutrphication occurs when algae growth increases and uses all the oxygen in the water. This lack of oxygen kills aquatic life. Toxins in the water can kill animals that drink surface waters. Researchers at the University of Southern Indiana see recycling as a cheaper alternative to incineration or the use of landfills. Another way to reduce the impact of landfills would be landfill mining. Landfill mining involves the extraction of buried metals, electronics, and minerals that would otherwise contribute to landfill masses. This is an environmentally friendly and cost effective means of producing and mining materials in other ways.
ReplyDeleteThis is an article on the issues surrounding landfills: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566504/
ReplyDeleteThanks for linking this article I learned a lot. I sometimes forget that landfills are still a thing and that they have such an impact of the area in which they reside. The fact that they harm animals makes sense because landfills are unnatural obstacles that we put in their way so they inevitability cause problems for the surrounding wild life and their safety.
Delete