Thursday, June 30, 2022

The Supreme Court Tries to Overrule the Climate

Wall Street may be the only other actor large enough to actually shift the momentum of our climate system. The pressure on banks, asset managers, and insurance companies will increase precisely because the Court has wrenched shut this other spigot. Convincing banks to stop funding Big Oil is probably not the most efficient way to tackle the climate crisis, but, in a country where democratic political options are effectively closed off, it may be the only path left. 

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-supreme-court-tries-to-overrule-the-climate?utm_source=onsite-share&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=onsite-share&utm_brand=the-new-yorker

Wednesday, June 22, 2022

Beware the Luxury Beach Resort — The Atlantic

…The people who might most benefit from this book (The Last Resort)—those who have bought into the myth of paradise with an ocean view, deleterious impact be damned, and have the means to regularly experience a version of it—don't want their illusions destroyed. If they were to receive The Last Resort as, say, a (passive-aggressive) birthday gift, they might well immediately fling it into the giveaway bin.

I don't say this to condemn those who hesitate to listen to the climate Cassandras among us, or who at any rate fail to act on warnings to desist from this or that treasured activity. I also choose to ignore many inconvenient truths, and the sacrifices that they should inspire but that would dampen my own pleasure in living: Forswearing fancy beach resorts just happens to be no skin off my sun-blistered back. If I can't help feeling that Stodola tries to have it both ways, which I read as a kind of hypocrisy, the reason I find it hard to swallow is that I so often do the same.

Or, rather, we all share in the hypocrisy, save for those few Earth angels who live off the grid and use no plastics. If we all paid attention to what is happening to the planet in the Anthropocene, we'd be running around with our heads on fire. Instead, we churn on in our lives, ordering stuff for next-day delivery when we could shop locally, driving to the grocery store only half a mile away instead of biking, and flipping the radio dial when another instance of extreme weather strikes, because we just can't bear what another fire or hurricane portends. All the while, we're nagged by conscience, which slowly drags our spirits down. Perhaps we need a nice beach vacation to recover! And so we go on, with our tidal cycles of unbearable guilt and panicked complicity, in and out, just like the ocean, where we sit and watch the sunset in our near-nakedness, drinking mai tais, in order to forget all the ways we are failing the Earth, in our vicious circularity, in our infinite regress.


This article appears in the July/August 2022 print edition with the headline "Beach Bummer." 

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/07/last-resort-beach-vacation-environmental-impact/638448/

Monday, June 20, 2022

Recovering America’s Wildlife Act (RAWA)

Saturday, June 18, 2022

Bhutan, “the world’s greenest nation”

"The most exceptional thing about Bhutan is the land itself. A majority of Bhutan’s citizens still live off the land, practicing subsistence agriculture and animal husbandry. The country’s tropical lowlands, pine forests, and alpine heights are bastions of biodiversity, populated by creatures found in few other places on the planet: the clouded leopard, the one-horned rhinoceros, the red panda, the sloth bear, the serow, and Bhutan’s national animal, a stocky ungulate called the takin, which looks a bit like a goat that’s been doing a lot of barbell work at the gym. The preservation of these ecosystems is a top priority in Bhutan, which has been called “the world’s greenest nation.” Almost all of Bhutan’s electricity comes from hydropower. Bhutan’s constitution mandates that 60 percent of its land remain under forest cover; currently, forests cover nearly three-quarters of the country’s approximately fifteen thousand square miles. All those trees have helped to make Bhutan a carbon sink: it absorbs three times as much CO2 as it emits, and is one of only two carbon-negative nations. (The other is Suriname.) An additional 4.4 million tons of annual CO2 emissions are offset by hydroelectricity exports, mostly to India, and Bhutan projects that the figure will rise to more than 22 million tons by the year 2025. The government has set ambitious goals for further progress. By 2030, Bhutan intends to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions and produce zero waste. By 2035, 100 percent of Bhutan’s agriculture will be organic. All of this has earned Bhutan a reputation as an earthly paradise, the last unsullied place. (The New York Times has called Bhutan “the real Shangri-La.”) Bhutanese officials dismiss this notion—yet they trade on it. Once, Bhutan admitted only twenty-five hundred tourists each year; today the number has swollen to one hundred thousand, with luxury resorts springing up in remote regions to lure eco-tourists. Bhutan’s official tourist slogan makes a bald appeal to the Eat, Pray, Love crowd: “Happiness is a place.” The realities of Bhutan are, of course, more complicated. On the streets of Thimphu, there are drug rehabilitation clinics and pizza joints, and when children get out of school, they discard their ghos and kiras for hoodies and skinny jeans. In 2020, the Bhutanese parliament passed a bill that decriminalized homosexuality, but gay, lesbian, and transgender Bhutanese are still stigmatized and subject to widespread prejudice. Gender equality is a work in progress. Few of the country’s elected officials are women. A 2017 study found that more than 40 percent of Bhutanese women surveyed had experienced physical or sexual partner violence and never told anyone or reported the incident. Gross National Happiness itself is entangled with troubling history. According to the official narrative promoted by the government, GNH has been national policy since the 1970s. But the scholar Lauchlan T. Munro has argued that GNH is an “invented tradition” that originated with a quip by the fourth king in a 1980 New York Times interview, and was only elevated to the status of “organizing ideology of the Bhutanese state” years later. This change, Munro says, was part of a “skillful and hard-nosed” response by the Royal Government of Bhutan (RGOB) to a series of domestic and geopolitical crises in the 1980s and early ’90s. During that period, a wave of Buddhist nationalism arose in Bhutan in reaction to the country’s rapid modernization and opening to the outside world. In an effort to appease traditionalists, and to address the social fracturing brought on by Bhutanese youth’s embrace of Western values and popular culture, the government began pushing a slew of new laws and reforms under the rubric “One Nation, One People.” These included the institution of a national dress and behavior code based on Bhutanese and Buddhist norms. At the same time, the RGOB enacted draconian measures against the population it refers to as Lhotshampa (“people from the south”), a mostly Hindu, Nepali-speaking minority in southern Bhutan. The government banned the use of Nepali in schools, forced the Lhotshampa to wear traditional Buddhist Bhutanese clothing, and conducted a census that was designed, critics assert, to delegitimize a population that had lived in Bhutan for centuries, designating thousands of Nepali Bhutanese as “migrant laborers” and illegal immigrants. According to one human rights report, “thousands of Nepali-Bhutanese were arrested, killed, tortured and given life sentences” during this period. In 1990–91, Bhutan’s army expelled an estimated one hundred thousand Nepali-speaking citizens, forcing them into refugee camps in eastern Nepal. Human Rights Watch has deemed these expulsions “ethnic cleansing”; Bhutan has been called the “world’s biggest creator of refugees by per capita.” It was in the aftermath of these events that Bhutan began touting Gross National Happiness as its official doctrine, promoting “the image of a small, landlocked, plucky country” following an “alternative path to development based on happiness, not material consumption.” It’s clear that Bhutan’s commitment to sustainable development is profound and unique; it’s clear that the antimaterialist ideals of GNH are deeply held by many in Bhutan. But it is also true that GNH has functioned as propaganda, giving a gauzy New Age spin to a policy of ethno-religious nationalism. In Bhutan as elsewhere, happiness is a goal, an ideal. A place? Perhaps not."

Two Wheels Good: The History and Mystery of the Bicycle" by Jody Rosen: https://a.co/gmfRWNI

Friday, June 17, 2022

Kill (at least some of) your lawn

Yes, You Can Do Better Than the Great American Lawn

"If you could even transition 10 percent of your lawn to something else, and water the rest less — that's a fantastic start"…

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/15/realestate/yes-you-can-do-better-than-the-great-american-lawn.html?referringSource=articleShare

Thursday, June 16, 2022

"We have to reframe the story of climate change"

Geraldine Brooks Had an Unpleasant Surprise When She Taught at Harvard
"Half my students had never read a Shakespeare play," says the historical novelist, whose latest book is "Horse." "That set my hair on fire."

...Which subjects do you wish more authors would write about?
We have to reframe the story of climate change so that it is not only about renunciation and loss, but also about possibility and joy. A wild lawn full of bees and wildflowers is more beautiful and less work than a dull expanse of toxic ChemLawn; a sunlight-powered electric car happens to be a more sporty drive than a gas vehicle, and a pre-owned treasure discovered while socializing with neighbors at the local Dumptique brings more satisfaction than a plastic tchotchke one-clicked on the internet. It's not about giving things up but finding better ways.
...
Do you prefer books that reach you emotionally, or intellectually?
How can you feel without thinking? In what world, or species, would those two qualities be separable?
...
If you could require the president to read one book, what would it be?

"The End of Nature," by Bill McKibben, with the publication date of 1989 picked out in highlighter. It might remind him we've faffed about on this crisis for more than three decades so it's time to stomp on Joe Manchin and get a climate package passed... nyt

Friday, June 10, 2022

Spring Awakening

By Michael Sims
June 10, 2022, 5:00 a.m. ET

The ocean was not the native habitat of Rachel Carson. She was born amid the tumbled hills near Pittsburgh, in Springdale, one of many western Pennsylvania hamlets that took root by a river and experienced a fleeting industrial heyday. Soon after I moved to this region I visited her birthplace on a pilgrimage of sorts, one I recently undertook again. Carson helped shape my worldview and values. An expert on the sea, through her vision of the operatic grandeur of evolution she gave context to my landlubber rambles. Childless herself, she helped frame my notions about parenting.

The Rachel Carson Homestead is a modest two-story house that I initially drove by without noticing, amid ordinary homes since built upon property once owned by her family. From her plank-floored room on the second floor, young Rachel could not see the Allegheny River sparkling at the bottom of the hill, but she could see smoke perpetually hanging over the town between its two large power plants. She could smell the glue factory. Born here on May 27, 1907, she attributed both her ambition to write and her love of nature to her mother and the tainted beauty of these riverside hills.

In 1925, when Carson ventured 14 miles to attend Pennsylvania College for Women in Pittsburgh, she wore homemade dresses that could not have been less Roaring Twenties. Now called Chatham University, Carson’s alma mater celebrates her as the inspiration for its Falk School of Sustainability and Environment and has even named its cougar mascot “Carson.” She started out as an English major, only to switch to biology after taking science classes with Mary Scott Skinker, who would become Carson’s mentor. “Biology” means the study of life: a large enough category to unite Carson’s intellectual and creative ambitions. “I have always wanted to write, but I know I don’t have much imagination,” she remarked to a friend. “Biology has given me something to write about.”

Tuesday, June 7, 2022

Walking with Thoreau & Muir

These Authors Follow in the Footsteps of Earlier Travelers, Literally

Recent travel books show an interest not just in distant places, but in distant times.

In SIX WALKS: In the Footsteps of Henry David Thoreau (Tin House, 279 pp., $22.95), the author Ben Shattuck retraces selected journeys Thoreau made across Cape Cod and New England. Since Thoreau is so well known for the small cabin he built alongside Walden Pond, one might imagine he preferred to view nature from inside a cozy shelter. But those more deeply familiar with his work know Thoreau was an avid and tireless walker, one who was not right in health or spirit if he did not spend at least four hours a day, and often more, "sauntering through the woods and over the hills and fields."

Shattuck, moved by the thoughtful, even at times ecstatic, observations in Thoreau's journals and essays, was motivated to follow his footsteps by the despair of a crushing breakup. His walks on Cape Cod, across Massachusetts and in Maine are written as meditations, not as guides, establishing from Page 1 that what sent him outside was the pain of loss.

Along the way, Shattuck finds endless points of identification with Thoreau, as when, camped on Wachusett Mountain, Shattuck wonders of the author-poet: "Was he doing the same thing I was doing? Walking to husk the dead skin of grief?" He finds parallels in their dreams, in their view of the stars, in their friendships and even in connections as odd as drug use and alien visitations. In one of the book's finer moments, the identification is so complete that, sitting inside Walden Pond's replica cabin, a bearded and sullen Shattuck is mistaken for a Thoreau re-enactor.

In the second half of these six walks, the author has recovered from his heartbreak and, perhaps inevitably, the work reflects this loss of urgency. Yet Shattuck shrewdly navigates the shift, turning his attention to the usefulness of sorrow, how underappreciated our painful moments are when we are in them. "Grief and joy are in the same life," Shattuck writes, "but it's only in the forest where you notice the shafts of sunlight spilling through." In writing of his walks, the author hits a few helpful notes of atonement, acknowledging Thoreau's racism toward Native Americans and his own privilege. (Wandering through private yards and sleeping on a Cape Cod beach, he recognizes, are less risky for him because he is a white man.) He also addresses larger sorrows of our time, including the impact of climate change on the beaches he walks. Mainly, though, Shattuck seeks to comfort himself, and his book is thus comforting. Grief in various permutations has become a near-constant companion to thinking people in our time, and so it seems we all could use a good, long walk right about now, something to restore our spiritual balance. And who better to guide us than Thoreau, whose writing, like his walking, is tireless, the antithesis of a teenager Shattuck hears shrieking on the side of a mountain that she is "Not. Having. Fun." And there's the point. It's not that life is without its agonies. It's the sweetness in the sorrow that is captured in this writing, along with the natural world's endless invitation to solace.

Not all journeys in somebody else's footsteps prove especially comforting. In A ROAD RUNNING SOUTHWARD: Following John Muir's Journey Through an Endangered Land (Island Press, 245 pp., $28), the Georgia journalist Dan Chapman retraces the ecologist John Muir's thousand-mile walk through the Reconstruction-era South, and what he finds there today is alarming.

In 1867, Muir, "father" of the national park system, conscience of the environmental movement and co-founder of the Sierra Club, traveled by foot from Louisville, Ky., to Florida, crossing one of the most biodiverse regions in the world and, at that time, a land of unspoiled beauty. The only threats Muir observed on his walk came from bandits, as life in the land of the defeated Confederacy was often quite desperate.

It is Chapman's mission not only to stand in Muir's shoes to see what he saw, but to view Muir's world through a 21st-century lens and consider "the future of an ever-sprawling, drought-challenged, climate-hammered South." It is difficult to look at.

Chapman took to Muir's trail in 2018, during one of the warmest Octobers on record for Georgia's coastal plain; the overwhelming state of the environment as he saw it was either threatened or already irredeemably harmed. Mass extinctions, disappearing farmland, polluted rivers, coal ash, wildfires, the desecration of old-growth forests and nature generally knocked out of balance are what the writer chronicles everywhere he turns his gaze. Even the national parks Muir inspired are now under pressure; the Smoky Mountains are being "loved to death." Scotland born and Wisconsin bred, Muir eventually called California's Yosemite Valley his home, but it was a moment of revelation as a young man on his thousand-mile walk, while camping in Bonaventure Cemetery near Savannah, Ga., that may have caused him to dedicate his life to nature. There, as Chapman puts it, Muir intuited that "nature would ultimately get crushed by man if not preserved." Chapman launches his exploration in that same cemetery, where, like Muir, he spends the night beneath the stars. (One of the curious revelations of these books as a whole is the apparent frequency with which men sleep outside without permission.) "It's getting late and I'm getting tired," Chapman writes as he settles down to sleep that first night, offering a metaphor as much as a statement of mood. Humans have done grievous harm to the earth in the past 150 years; it is exhausting at times to look at what we've done, and yet we're running out of time to reverse course and spare the world far more dire consequences. nyt