Atlas Shrugged is one of my favorite books; I have read it at least three times. It’s a mystery and an adventure story. It’s about struggle and failure and success. It’s like Harold Robbins' popular novels (you won’t know him) where the protagonist has a particular vision or drive, works hard, and finally, against all odds, succeeds. They are, in a sense, uplifting. But they are pulp fiction. The society that Rand presents does not represent the real world. It is totally black or white; extreme selfishness or extreme, unrealistic, altruism; producers or parasites. Even the young me, not yet the liberal socialist pinko I am today, could see, and be put off by, the exaggerations. It would be interesting to explore the psychology behind the attraction to her.
I
often talk about my sense that the great American failure is that we lack any
appreciation for collectivism; that “American individualism” as it is
represented by some is an impediment to building a better society. I had
forgotten the strong role that Ayn Rand’s work played in providing a "philosophical" basis for right wing thought. If we want to understand the Kochs, we need to
read Atlas Shrugged. Given the
importance, as shown in Falter, of Rand’s thinking to providing a foundation
for the thinking of the Kochs and their giant influencing projects, all of us
should read Atlas Shrugged. We cannot effectively challenge their thinking
unless we know what they are thinking. Read it, just skip the long multi-page
diatribes where her “philosophy” was expressed. Find out “who is John Galt.”
And then read real philosopher’s writings on individualism
and collectivism. Just start with the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy or
the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. We need to know more about this if we
are to get out of our partisan paralysis. The ideas of Ayn Rand are at the very
heart of right wing thinking, and understanding your opposition is necessary
for any successful negotiation.
Ayn
Rand’s philosophy strongly condemns government “theft” of an individual’s money
and its redistribution to unworthy parasites (like you and me). But the Ayn Rand
Institute recently took PPP money. Watch the explanation why that was okay for
them to do. I think he is saying that if you protest that taking money from the individual
is theft, it’s okay to take a distribution of that money from the government, but
it you don’t protest the taking, it is not okay to take the money, or something
like that. I couldn’t watch the whole thing, but it gives you the idea. And the
Mike Wallace interview gives you an introduction to the great philosopher
herself.
Weekly Participation Summary
10/12 This post
10/14 Comment on DQ on how much better
off CEOs are now
10/08 Speaking of Dark Money
Week Eight Point Total – 5
Eight Week Cumulative Point Total – 40
Of course the elephant in the room is Rand's admiration for Nietzsche, or at least her understanding (possible misunderstanding) of Nietzschean contempt for weakness and egalitarianism. More puzzling to me is her admiration of Aristotle, I'm hoping there's good evidence of misunderstanding there. I do know she badly misunderstood pragmatism.
ReplyDeleteLooked up an old post, to remind myself of what I disliked in her remarks on the pragmatists... Most egregiously she interprets Wm James as a raging relativist and ignores John Dewey's constant call for "intelligence" in denigrating his view as simply "act first, think later"...
Deletehttps://osopher.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/rand/
I do think it is interesting you were able to read and enjoy Ayn Rand without being swayed by her lurking agendas. I cannot say the same for other people I know. It makes me consider what about people drives them to aspire to certain world views. Is it nature? Is it nurture? Or some combination of the two? It certainly bodes well for the idea of open discourse on topics, but the question remains: what ultimately makes people choose their world view?
ReplyDelete