Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Is Capitalism Inherently Bad for the Environment?

On Pages 118&119, Hawken truly opens up about how he thinks the free market ideology, while originally intended to protect and increase social welfare, has failed miserably for its biggest supporter, the United States.

Earlier in the week, on Monday to be precise, I believe it was Morgan that brought that in order for true security to exist, it must be enforced through equality programs and in exchange for freedom, which to me, sounds like the bleaker side of Communism. However, and this can even be viewed in some dystopic science fiction films, the Communist/Faschist Utopia's usually are quite clean. Aeon Flux and Metropolis come to mind.

However, when you think about the Dystopic Science Fictions involving the ravages of Free Market and Deregulation, you have the terribly digusting landscapes such as in: Mad Max, A Boy and His Dog (although where the rich people are is considerably communist, and quite clean.), Blade Runner, and on the subject of prison overpopulation in America, Death Race comes to mind.

Sure, these are fiction films, but Science Fiction tends to have a knack for becoming true (Zombie Apocalypse notwithstanding). Do you all think certain forms of government are naturally more environmentally friendly? Why and why not?

2 comments:

  1. Well, the European nations that are pushing bicycle infrastructure, wind & solar etc., are a lot greener than the U.S. Is that because they are governed by non-"free market fundamentalists"? I'd say so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. After considering your movie references I'd like to give one back to you. The movie Blindness which I believe depicts an accurate take on the Hobbesian state of Nature. Also in the movie/cartoon Aeon Flux the environment is clean but there is nothing new, no new ideas, no new people, they recycle everything even souls. Our present society is messy but authentic. I intend o watch your other suggestions.

    ReplyDelete