Yes, greenlands Ice Is Melting but…
OPINION
A trip there changed my mind about climate change while reinforcing
my belief that markets, not government, provide the cure.
By Bret Stephens
Photographs by Damon Winter
Mr. Stephens is an Opinion
columnist. Mr. Winter is a staff photographer on assignment in Opinion.
ILULISSAT, GREENLAND — On a clear day in August, a helicopter set me and a few
companions down on the northern end of the Jakobshavn Glacier in Western
Greenland, about 150 miles north of the Arctic Circle. The ground under our
feet seemed almost lunar: gray silt and dust, loose rocks and boulders, and, at
the edge of the glacier’s face, mud so deep it nearly ate my boots. To the
south, the calving front of the glacier known in Greenlandic as Sermeq Kujalleq
periodically deposited enormous slabs of ice, some more than 100 feet high,
into the open water.
I asked the pilot to
give me a sense of how much the glacier had retreated since he had been flying
the route. He pointed to a distant rocky island in the middle of the fjord.
“That’s where the
glacier was in 2007,” he said.
Over the course of the
20th century, the Jakobshavn Glacier retreated about 10 to 15 kilometers. Over
just the next eight years, it retreated about the same amount, according to the
oceanographer Josh Willis of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Later the front
advanced a little — a function of complex dynamics partly involving ocean
currents — before resuming its retreat.
No comments:
Post a Comment