Sunday, October 4, 2020

Questions Oct 5-7

  • Might McKibben and Steven Pinker ("None of us are as happy as we ought to be..." 2) both be right?
  • Do you also live in a state of "engagement, not despair"? 3
  • Are any parts of "the human game" (8) more vibrant or less threatened by climate change than others? 
  • Does the depth, complexity, and beauty involved in creating something so prosaic as asphalt shingles reinforce for you our culture's confidence in "progress"? In economic growth? Are we on an "enlightened" path? 
  • Are the recent fates of the baobab tree and the Seed Vault ominous harbingers? 12
  • Does the fact that our civilization has only been here for "the blink of an eye" make you more, or less, optimistic? 13
  • Is the American way of life up for negotiation whether we like it or not? 14
  • Are robots and AI necessarily a "replacement technology" in a way that moots concern for the "human game"? 15
  • Is the Earth's ultimate extinction "more philosophy than [you] can manage? 16 
  • Do we need to keep our game human? Will it be less, or differently, human if we continue to develop robotics, AI, genetic engineering etc.? 17
  •  Do you have any thoughts about "Rise," or about the power of the poetic imagination to move people and make them care?
  • Add your questions please



The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined
by Steven Pinker Believe it or not, today we may be living in the most peaceful moment in our species' existence...despite the ceaseless news about war, crime, and terrorism, violence has actually been in decline over long stretches of history. Exploding myths about humankind's inherent violence and the curse of modernity, this ambitious book continues Pinker's exploration of the essence of human nature, mixing psychology and history to provide a remarkable picture of an increasingly enlightened world.

Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress
by Steven Pinker

If you think the world is coming to an end, think again: people are living longer, healthier, freer, and happier lives, and while our problems are formidable, the solutions lie in the Enlightenment ideal of using reason and science.

Is the world really falling apart? Is the ideal of progress obsolete? In this elegant assessment of the human condition in the third millennium, cognitive scientist and public intellectual Steven Pinker urges us to step back from the gory headlines and prophecies of doom, which play to our psychological biases. Instead, follow the data: In seventy-five jaw-dropping graphs, Pinker shows that life, health, prosperity, safety, peace, knowledge, and happiness are on the rise, not just in the West, but worldwide. This progress is not the result of some cosmic force. It is a gift of the Enlightenment: the conviction that reason and science can enhance human flourishing.

Far from being a naïve hope, the Enlightenment, we now know, has worked. But more than ever, it needs a vigorous defense. The Enlightenment project swims against currents of human nature–tribalism, authoritarianism, demonization, magical thinking–which demagogues are all too willing to exploit. Many commentators, committed to political, religious, or romantic ideologies, fight a rearguard action against it. The result is a corrosive fatalism and a willingness to wreck the precious institutions of liberal democracy and global cooperation... {Pinker] makes the case for reason, science, and humanism: the ideals we need to confront our problems and continue our progress. g'r
“As we care about more of humanity, we’re apt to mistake the harms around us for signs of how low the world has sunk rather than how high our standards have risen.”

“What is progress? You might think that the question is so subjective and culturally relative as to be forever unanswerable. In fact, it’s one of the easier questions to answer. Most people agree that life is better than death. Health is better than sickness. Sustenance is better than hunger. Abundance is better than poverty. Peace is better than war. Safety is better than danger. Freedom is better than tyranny. Equal rights are better than bigotry and discrimination. Literacy is better than illiteracy. Knowledge is better than ignorance. Intelligence is better than dull-wittedness. Happiness is better than misery. Opportunities to enjoy family, friends, culture, and nature are better than drudgery and monotony. All these things can be measured. If they have increased over time, that is progress.”

“Our greatest enemies are ultimately not our political adversaries but entropy, evolution (in the form of pestilence and the flaws in human nature), and most of all ignorance—a shortfall of knowledge of how best to solve our problems.”

“Remember your math: an anecdote is not a trend. Remember your history: the fact that something is bad today doesn't mean it was better in the past. Remember your philosophy: one cannot reason that there's no such thing as reason, or that something is true or good because God said it is. And remember your psychology: much of what we know isn't so, especially when our comrades know it too.

Keep some perspective. Not every problem is a Crisis, Plague, Epidemic, or Existential Threat, and not every change is the End of This, the Death of That, or the Dawn of a Post-Something Era. Don't confuse pessimism with profundity: problems are inevitable, but problems are solvable, and diagnosing every setback as a symptom of a sick society is a cheap grab for gravitas. Finally, drop the Nietzsche. His ideas may seem edgy, authentic, baad,while humanism seems sappy, unhip, uncool But what's so funny about peace, love, and understanding?”


W 7 
  • "By the middle of this century the ocean may contain more plastic than fish by weight... since 1950 we've wiped out perhaps 90% of the big fish..." 46 COMMENT? Would you say we've been a bit self-indulgent, and imprudent (if not disrespectful) with regard to ocean habitats?
  • Why do we take the oceans so much for granted? **
  • "It was a bustling city, like in Finding Nemo. But now it just seems quiet..." Should restoration of damaged reefs and other ocean ecosystems be a priority? 
  •  COMMENT: "The earth will be fine; its humans who are in trouble." 50
  • Are you able to be "philosophical" about the prospect of something like the late-Cretaceous asteroid that ended the dinosaurs and made way for us, ending us? Or do you harbor higher hopes for humanity? 51
  • "A suburb is designed to hide the natural world." 55 Can this be repaired?
  • Do you feel guilt for the way your European forebears displaced and destroyed the indigenous native Americans? How should they be compensated?
  • "If the economy doesn't grow larger each year, we now suffer as a result." 58 Are we in a Catch-22?
  • "Nobody with a choice ventures outside." 61 Is that a world any human should want to live in?
  • Will we "walk away methodically" or "flee in panic"? 62
  • Are humans endlessly adaptable, as Rex Tillerson suggested? 63
  • Does the prospect of rising tides "washing away history" sadden you? 64
  • "Tomorrow was always a problem for tomorrow" 66 - Can we learn to think of tomorrow as our problem?
  • What happened to the climate-woke Obama of 2008? 67
  • In view of the problem with natural gas leaks, are you less comfortable with using it? 68
  • COMMENT? "We've face problems from hell before." 70 
  • Isn't it huge that "sun and wind are [now] the cheapest way to generate power on planet Earth"? 71
  • Should we boycott Exxon, Shell, Chevron, Amoco,... ? 72ff.
  • In 2017 90% of Americans didn't know there was a scientific consensus on global warming." 77 How do we fix that?
  • Does the 1st amendment really preserve one's "right to lie"? 79 Or is that a matter of judicial interpretation?
  • Both sides knew that global warming was "real" but we've still been debating it endlessly. How do we fix that?
**
  

9 comments:

  1. All of the texts that we have read in class have spurred a few questions in my mind, and McKibbben's 'Falter' briefly touches on each of them. So I will post them here. Consider them additional Discussion Questions, if they pique your interest.
    1. Are you of the mindset that, when it comes to addressing the climate crisis, "someone will find a solution" (i.e. in terms of technologies, etc)? Is this on blind faith? Does your belief excuse you from taking actionable change? Is this a moral stance?

    2. Do America and other nations owe reparations to nations that will be disproportionately affected by our carbon consumption?

    3. Should negligence in facing climate change constitute a violation of human rights? Should continued association with industries proven to value profit over the 'quality of life' of future generations be allowed? Does American policy value property rights over human rights?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The tone on these questions is a bit off, but I am legitimately curious.

      Delete
  2. "The earth will be fine; its humans who are in trouble."

    I like to believe that this is true. Earth has existed before human-like creatures have inhabited the planet and was thriving when we did not have the technological discoveries that we had in the past 300 years. People got smarter and maybe Earth did too by adapting. Once we go extinct, I think nature will take back what we have took from them. Of course, there is no way to get back all the fish we have overfished in the ocean, the countless animals we were breeding for them to end up on our dinner table. On the one hand, the population of pigs, cows, chicken might actually go down but on the other hand, earth will never gain back all the species that have gone extinct because of us.
    It also depends on how long we keep this behavior of destroying our planet up and if we will ever break the cycle and change how we are living. If anything, we will probably not be here to see earth taking over again or just a small amount people.
    I think throughout the course and especially reading the book of Hope Jahren, made me realize how much has already changed on our planet, on the home we call earth. It definitely does not mean that every discovery or improvement we have made in the past is bad, but what we need is another wave of improvement, that is basically making all our technological advances safe for the environment.
    To sum it up, I really do hope that earth recovers from us, if it actually comes to a time when we do go extinct. Maybe the whole cycle starts again, with humans starting from scratch? Or we just find another planet in the galaxy and try again!

    -This Essay +3
    - Comment to Allenah “Can we go without AC for more days of the year?”
    To Patrick “Why do we take the Oceans so much for granted?”
    To Levi “Next Steps”
    Total Points: 35pts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hope Jahren's book also put into perspective the amount of change that has occurred. I never realized the drastic we've impacted the environment. I agree with you that humans are the ones that are in trouble. Additionally, if we are to go extinct, I agree Earth will return to a better environment, or at least I'd like to think that. However, I wonder if some of the things we've done have permanently damaged Earth.

      Delete
  3. Why do we take the oceans so much for granted?

    We don’t live in or on the ocean. I feel like it’s one of those things that’s out of sight out of mind for a lot of people. It’s hard to grasp a concept when you can’t see it especially something of that size. Our educational system does not do a very good job at addressing environmental issues especially when it comes to the ocean. I feel like most people don’t realize how important the ocean is for us. The ocean stabilizes the climate, it provides food security for about a billion of us, supports biodiversity, makes trade, tourism and transport possible and holds great potential for clean energy from waves, tides and currents. The ocean is the most important ecosystem on the planet. We need to start understanding the ocean better and realize how much it does for us. Unfortunately, we fail to understand how important the ocean is and instead, many of us take it for granted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Does the depth, complexity, and beauty involved in creating something so prosaic as asphalt shingles reinforce for you our culture's confidence in "progress"? In economic growth? Are we on an "enlightened" path?

    I was very surprised by how much goes into making asphalt shingles, and I would say it did make me feel more confident in at least our ability as a culture to progress. I don't think we are on a particularly "enlightened" path, but I do think we have the tools to do amazing things. What seems to be missing is the motivation to improve the environment, which I guess is why I don't think we are on an enlightened path—not yet at least.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Does the fact that our civilization has only been here for "the blink of an eye" make you more, or less, optimistic? 13

    Hm it makes me feel a little bit of both! The fact that we have only been here for a short time means that it didn't take very long at all for us to significantly impact our environment. To think that we used that time to cause drastic changes that will not only hurt us but everything else on the planet, is not a good thought. But, the fact that we haven't been here for very long may also show that there is room for improvement, should we be lucky enough to have the time to learn and grow from this. Maybe it won't take too much time to reverse the negative effects of our behaviors, if we act right now (that's the tough part, I suppose)!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also had the same idea about our impact on Earth in such a short amount of time. With the billions of years Earth has been around, and the six million years humans have been a live, it's crazy what all we've done. While there are some positive aspects to humans, as far as the environment goes, I feel like most things are negative. I love your optimistic approach on improvement and hope it really happens.

      Delete
  6. Why do we take the oceans so much for granted?

    I think the biggest reason why we take the ocean for granted is the same reason we would take anything else for granted. When we are not directly effected by what happens to something or someone (or we don’t believe we are), then it can sometimes lead us us to believe that it’s not our responsibility to do anything. In this case, we are not effected by what happens to the ocean in curtain ways therefore we don’t think its our responsibility to have keep up with it, even though it is apart of the environment in which we constantly use. Similar to that reason, we can also have a ‘out of sight, out of mind’ mindset about it, where if the issues are not constantly in our face then we shut out or forget that there was ever a problem in the first place.

    ReplyDelete