Saturday, November 7, 2020

Questions Nov 9-11

We still need to schedule Nov 16-18. If no one chooses to report on those dates, I suggest we crowd-source our content: let's each find a book, article, website, or video (etc.) to share, write about, and discuss. 

Nov 11
  • Have we just experienced four years of a "shock doctrine" presidency? Are more shocks in store? 235
  • "Trump represents a crisis that could echo through geologic time." 236 Will his administration's environmental legacy be of that scale? Or will its termination mitigate that impact? (See "legacy" article...)
  • Will Trump have been the crisis "sparking progressive transformation" that "catapult(s) us forward"?
  • Do you agree that "simply resisting" is inadequate, that "we also need a bold and forward-looking 'yes'"? 237
  • Is the wave of youthful activism represented by Greta (and Stuart's 8th-graders) more a resistance movement or a Yes movement?
  • Is neoliberalism the principal source of our problems? (see article...)
  • Do you agree that we have a "gig and dig economy"? 240
  • Can you suggest a better motto than "Leave the oil and gas in the ground, but leave no worker behind"? 241
  • Can an American politician run effectively on a platform of making reparations to the Global South?





  • What do you think of Losing Earth? [NYT Mag] Should we take a closer look next week?
  • Was Nathaniel Rich right or wrong about the late 80s ("the conditions for success could not have been more favorable"... “Nearly everything we understand about global warming was understood in 1979.”? 243f.



  • Is "human nature" our biggest climate problem? Or is capitalism? 245, 247, 250
  • What do you think of Time's "Planet of the Year"?
  • If "meeting the challenge of climate change would have required imposing stiff regulations on polluters while investing in the public sphere to transform how we power our lives, live in cities, and move ourselves around," are we more or less prepared to meet that challenge now than we were three decades ago? 249
  • Do you agree that "a new form of democratic eco-socialism" is our "best shot at collective survival"? 251
 

  • Do you agree that Puerto Rico's woes are due mostly to "decisions made by people working for powerful interests" and not "acts of God"? 255
  • Will we now have a "timid Democrat in the White House"? 260
  • Are we ready for "a more probing conversation about the limits of lifestyles" devoted to consumerism? 264
  • How do we get our issues out of "silos"? 268
  • Has Hollywood yet made a responsible and constructive environmental film? 274
  • Will we need something like a WPA Federal Art Project to "reframe" the way most people think about the scale of change required to meet our climate/social justice challenge? 276
  • What do you think of the "postcards from the future"? Can such short films change hearts and minds?
  • What do you want to read and discuss next? More Wendell Berry? The Long Now? Or should we each just find something and share it?

Nov 9
  • We last met under a cloud of uncertainty about the election outcome and its consequences for the "human game." Is it yet possible to declare "a single, overarching lesson" that begins "Never underestimate the power of _____"? 191
  • Do you recall your post-election state of mind four years ago? In retrospect, did subsequent events meet your expectations or confirm your fears?
  • Do you expect to see a substantial "redistributive agenda" vigorously pursued in the years ahead? 192
  • Will the nation finally turn a corner on racism and misogyny, post-Trump? 192
  • Do you expect the Biden-Harris administration consistently to apply the Black test? Did the Obama administration? Will Congress be any less recalcitrant? 194
  • Is intersectionality really possible? Can all crises be prioritized equally? Or is this a rhetorical symbol? 
  

 

  • Thoughts on the discovery of a new Australian coral reef?

4 comments:

  1. Will Trump have been the crisis "sparking progressive transformation" that "catapult(s) us forward"?

    It remains to be seen. But, I hope so because then at least something good can come out of it. The record high voting turn out this year at the very least shows more and more Americans are finally choosing to include themselves in the political process. That is a good thing. Whether or not we are close to big progressive changes, I don't know. The voting turnout this year also highlighted just how divided we still are as a nation. Whether or not change will happen at this point will probably be determined by Biden's ability to unite people and bring science back into the conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are we ready for "a more probing conversation about the limits of lifestyles" devoted to consumerism? 264

    I want to say yes, but in reality I don't think we are actually ready for that message to be received with serious consideration by the American people. Our culture revolves around the here and now, and I'm not sure what it will take to get us to shift focus on the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you had asked me what it would take to shift America away from its consumerist traditions a year ago, I would have said that it would take a global crisis disrupting supply chains, preventing individuals from working/shopping, and one that would force families to spend time together. But now living in the world of COVID, one can see that we need something much more drastic...

      Delete
  3. Will the nation finally turn a corner on racism and misogyny, post-Trump? 192

    To answer if the nation will finally turn a corner when it comes to racism and misogyny, I would say yes. We still have a long road to travel ahead of us now that Trump is out of office but I do believe that his presence served the purpose of exposing these type of issues on a deeper level especially for those who really believed that issues like racism were long behind or that it had gotten better throughout our history. Now, it is time to actually begin to deal with it, hopefully with the proper leadership in place that can help aid in the process instead of making it worse.

    ReplyDelete