Thursday, September 10, 2020

Weekly Essay

 

The Ethics of solar panels

While I do believe that most people would say that we need to change over from fossil fuels to green energy just so we don’t run out the finite fuels that our planet has.  I would say though that we are ethically bound to do so in a way that does not harm the environment, which is not the case with today’s version of solar panels which have become synonymous with green energy.  The current production for solar panels creates greenhouse gases which goes against the reason against why we made them to begin with.  Also, the way they measure the environmental impact the production of solar panels has on the planet is reliant on the companies supplying the data.   

            Then there is the problem with what to do with solar panels after they break, because the simple fact is solar panels are not recycle friendly.  As a matter of fact, this green solution is considered hazardous by many governments, including California.  Another problem is that you can’t toss them into any old landfill because the toxic materials inside the product could break and leach into the soil.  Then there is problem of replacing broken solar panels as recycling them doesn’t cover the cost of purchasing new solar panels either.  You also have to consider what is inside these solar panels as well.  While, I will admit that solar panel companies do use less lead than others in the production of their product, they do contain cadmium telluride which is hazardous containment.  Although the George Washington University released a study that said that solar panels are safe under normal conditions, but as the saying goes “no plan survives contact with the enemy” you can’t expect normal conditions all the time in life so the question how much damage would these containments do to the environment if they did leak out.


Solar Panels Produce Tons of Toxic Waste—Literally - American Experiment

 

4 comments:

  1. Solutions to problems will always create more problems to deal with. There are kinks to work out in renewable energy, however their overall impact still remains less than that of fossil fuels. Unless we can come up with a better solution to our energy problem, it is best to continue working on the solutions we have right now in order to improve them and their efficiency. I do agree that more research should be done, but that only happens with more people using solar panels and our government supporting such research.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On the front of government support, solar panels are interesting. The Federal government has already issues a fair bit of financial support in the industry, with the industry receiving $75 billion from 2009-2019. However, compared to the money fossil fuel companies receive, just under $15 billion a year, it is but pennies (1). The Environmental and Energy study Institute published a list of some of the various direct and indirect subsidies the fossil fuel industry receives (2).

      (1) https://www.ewg.org/energy/22777/federal-energy-subsidies-what-are-we-getting-our-money
      (2) https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-fossil-fuel-subsidies-a-closer-look-at-tax-breaks-and-societal-costs

      Delete
  2. I'd not heard that building solar panels creates an exorbitant amount of greenhouse gases, can you document that?

    And, Tyler, when you notice that an image you've posted is too big for the space, please shrink it. I'll do that for you this time. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Regarding the hidden cost of Solar Panels, there was study published a few years back that measured the efficiency of solar panels. The study found solar and wind, and surprisingly nuclear energy to be substantially more efficient than fossil fuels by a long shot.

      https://www.carbonbrief.org/solar-wind-nuclear-amazingly-low-carbon-footprints

      Delete